Fifteen years of scattered psychometric work, integrated into one elicited-intake instrument with bounded AI interpretation.
Solitude, persona, bonding, culture, inner richness — each has a mature research literature and its own validated scales, scored in different labs, in different decades, never together. Whole Self with AI synthesises that work into a single architecture: five umbrella indices, each aggregating established instruments into one accessible score and an interpretive structure you can actually read.
STI · Self-architecture
The capacity to be alone — chosen versus imposed solitude, the settings that suit you, and whether you use time alone for emotional repair or merely endure it.
Storr · Winnicott · Long & Averill · Nguyen, Ryan & Deci
PFI · Self-architecture
How the self shifts across contexts — which roles feel authentic and which feel costumed, where you sit on the identity diffusion–achievement spectrum, and your protean capacity to hold many voices without dissolving.
Goffman · Markus & Nurius · Hermans · Marcia · Lifton
BTI · Self-architecture
Attachment and belonging — fusion, transactional, organic, and autonomy patterns mapped onto the established adult-attachment styles, with a secure-base and inclusion-of-other reading.
Bowlby · Ainsworth · Hazan & Shaver · Mikulincer & Shaver
CCI · Self-architecture
Bicultural identity integration, cultural frame-switching, and sociocultural adaptation — adapted directly from published cross-cultural instruments.
Benet-Martínez & Haritatos (BIIS) · Searle & Ward (SCAS) · Hong et al.
PRI · Inner life
Four inner-life sub-scales in one composite — psychological richness, narrative identity, curiosity, and self-reflection & insight — scored individually and as a whole.
Oishi · McLean / NISE · Kashdan (5DCR) · Grant (SRIS)
The cross-validation layer is what makes the instrument honest: where what you report and how you narrate diverge, the platform shows you the tension rather than smoothing it over.
Established, peer-reviewed questionnaires under five umbrella indices. Likert items, staggered across sessions, resumable — no clinical appointment, no waiting room.
Optional reflective prompts capture how you actually talk about your life — the naturalistic text the scores can be checked against.
Your self-report scores are compared, deterministically, against text features from your narrative. Where the two diverge by more than a standard deviation, the platform surfaces it as an interesting tension — no AI judgement involved.
A schema-constrained model synthesises your structured scores — never the raw text — into a short, personalised summary. It is prohibited from speculating beyond what the scores support.
Plenty of work bridges parts of this — NISE for narrative identity, PERMA for flourishing, the Dialogical Self for multiplicity, attachment for bonding. None brings the whole architecture together. What no existing tool does:
Whole Self with AI is in active development. The first release walks you through the five indices, returns your scores and interpretive bands, and adds the elicited cross-validation that makes it novel. If you'd like to be among the first to try it, get in touch.